The Unbalanced Life

Just encountered this very interesting article about Erin Callan, former CFO of Lehman Brothers. She had written an opinion piece in the New York Times about the work/life balance debate facing people as she reflected on her life. As a high level executive, her work became her life, and as a result other aspects had to take a backseat.

‘I don’t have children, so it might seem that my story lacks relevance to the work-life balance debate. Like everyone, though, I did have relationships — a spouse, friends and family — and none of them got the best version of me. They got what was left over.

A very harsh realization, and sadly she found this out too late. However, there is a quote in the article written by Andrew Hill, which caught, my eye that I believe could confuse the issue facing the choices of contemporary career seekers.

If employees lean in, only to keel over on to the boardroom table out of fatigue, something is wrong,” writes Andrew Hill in the Financial Times Monday, referencing the title of Sandberg’s new tome. “The book and Ms. Callan’s lament expose a problem with the system, not just with the people in it. Managers ought to be creating the conditions to get the best work from all staff, not simply to extract the most work from a determined few. If employees are driven, or drive themselves, to unproductive and unhappy extremes, the whole corporate economy suffers.

The crux of the issue; business is about making money. Employees are simply tools used by business in order to achieve this end. Whether we like it or not, the truth of the matter is that men are better at this particular role as they can be the breadwinners while the wife can stay at home if she chooses (if possible) or work a less stressful job. Thus giving her the time to actually rear a family if she desires. The question is how easy can businesses afford to make life for their employees in order to avoid creating more situations like Erin Callan’s? Perks such as extended leaves of absence, or flexible working hours come at a cost to the company, which we all know affects the bottom line.

Don’t get me wrong here; I’m not saying that there aren’t men who haven’t sacrificed their family life for the almighty dollar or that working men to death is acceptable. Nor am I implying that women shouldn’t strive for elite positions in business if that is their dream. Lastly, I’m also not in favor of overworking your employees simply to stay in the black. Yes there has to be a reasonable balance (there’s that word again) for even the most rudimentary business to get the best from their employees. The bottom line I wish to touch on here; while both men and women have to keep this work/life balance in mind, it’s women who have to be even more realistic about their goals and make their choices accordingly. I repeat myself often here but it’s in the hopes that people may eventually listen. A woman simply can’t forgo the finality of their positions in life. You simply can’t make up for lost time, once the window is closed; it often is closed for good.

We all know that many argue the unfairness of the situation. That men don’t have to make a huge choice between the boardroom and settling down to have a family, but during this debate, we lose sight of the truth. Arguing about the equality of a situation, which can’t be changed, is simply a waste of time. No, it isn’t fair that an up and coming female business elite will have to take time off from work in order to start a family, the reality is who precisely do you take that particular issue too?

Mother Nature tends to be a little steadfast, and I doubt anyone knows where her secretary is to set up a board meeting.

This issue isn’t one to be placed on the doorstop of Money Inc, but simply to realize the limitations both genders face as they strive for corporate success. The ugly reality is that when women approach their careers the way men do, they end up losing a lot more than they bargained for.

I have spent several years now living a different version of my life, where I try to apply my energy to my new husband, Anthony, and the people whom I love and care about. But I can’t make up for lost time. Most important, although I now have stepchildren, I missed having a child of my own. I am 47 years old, and Anthony and I have been trying in vitro fertilization for several years. We are still hoping.

The truth is that Erin Callan is much closer to menopause than motherhood and sadly, I’d wager that her ship has already sailed. So many contemporary women have hailed Erin as a hero by ascending the ladder of success. However this quote seems to sum up her position on the matter in a very stark and serious manner.

 Sometimes young women tell me they admire what I’ve done. As they see it, I worked hard for 20 years and can now spend the next 20 focused on other things. But that is not balance. I do not wish that for anyone.

Sadly, most won’t listen to her position, many being misinformed about aspects such as their fertility in addition to believing it won’t happen to them. I highly doubt Erin thought she would wind up there either.


Posted in General | 2 Comments

A Epidemic of Laryngitis?



I’m sure everyone’s heard of Laryngitis, an illness which can render someone either completely mute, or leaving them sounding like Tone Loc whispering. Now, is it possible for someone to both have laryngitis while being able to speak? Came across an interesting quote from Crella in regards to a woman’s regretful choice, which really got me thinking about this very topic.

“‘Lost their “voices”? Is she fucking kidding? We are bombarded by their endless whinging about everything from imaginary workplace discrimination (sob) to how much they regret mismanaging their relationships (double plus sob).’

Yes, that ‘s a classic, isn’t it? Until recently Femisting’s home page had a comment about giving women a voice. When have they not had one!?”” (emphasis mine)

Very good question isn’t it? Don’t women have even more say now than they’ve ever had in history? In fact, one could say that they have much more than even men in this day and age, no? I have a hypothesis, that when contemporary women mean they wish to have a voice, they really mean they simply would like a choice.

Seems fair enough, and considering the distinct lack of choices women had in the past, it appears a reasonable enough request. For them to have more choices, for them to have a voice in regards to their own lives instead of being told what they can and can’t do. So what’s the issue now, why is it that Jill Bennett was so aggrieved about losing her voice during the end of her 10 year relationship?

In my opinion as it appears to me, it simply seems to be the frustration of having no say in the prior lack of commitment and later exit of her aggrieved boyfriend. So this really means that when some women wish to have a voice, or a choice, would much of the bellyaching they seem to be doing now is trying to have their cake and eat it too as Towgunner points out so eloquently?

Choices have consequences, use your voice and make your choices wisely. That is part of responsibility!!

At this point, however, this apparent ‘laryngitis epidemic’ seems to be happening while women are still largely controlling the mainstream media which is interesting to say the least. They have a voice, but still maintain that they don’t which I find very ironic considering where Feminism could eventually lead. You see, normally I don’t post too much about what exactly the end of feminism could look like. Mainly because my crystal ball is no less broken than anyone else’s’.  However, to any one of you who’s read the Misandry Bubble and understood TFH’s concepts, has anyone really considered what the end result for women truly could be?  Will it not be women virtually losing their voices completely?

As I’ve stated in the past, I speak in concepts; it may appear to be hyperbole, but that’s simply how I’ve learned to keep myself grounded (weird, I know). The main concepts affecting men and women’s relationships I see behind The Misandry Bubble finally bursting will be;

  1. Due to economic shortfall from men not manning up and starting families, many jobs will possibly be lost by both men and women
  1. Governments may have to scale back their many programs due to the lack of their previous tax base since younger men aren’t marrying in the same numbers to replace their outgoing counterparts

These two points are meant to show the possibility that Government backed security, which women sometimes require as a surrogate husband, will be greatly weakened in the future. In addition the comfy lifestyle  which we are all accustomed, will most likely come to an end. At this point, we need to consider what this means to many women during this time.

  1. Stable marriage minded men would be in a better position to pick a wife as they should be rare (and valuable) while marriage minded women will be plentiful, and unfortunately not as valuable
  1. Due to the devolvement of slut shaming and chastity, women will have little to no leverage in negotiating with a man to marry them and will have to accept far less WHILE giving far more than they would have in the past

This is the ugly truth that I believe we are headed for at the conclusion of TFH’s Misandry Bubble. Where marriage once more goes from a luxury some women feel entitled too, to a necessity that women will have to fight for or face severe consequences.

So, what sort of world does this ascribe to women? How many choices does one think women will have if (and yes it is a big if) the Misandry Bubble Blows up in this manner?  Technically speaking, women would STILL have the legal power they do now, but what about the choices available to them? Would the government even be able to enforce these rules in women’s favor?

At the end of the day, my personal belief is that the Misandry Bubble, which IS the logical conclusion of Feminism, will in actuality leave women far worse off than when the suffragettes marched years ago!! The world will have regressed to a point where Patriarchy would have saved women’s interests, but will have to face the world without chastity and men’s commitment.  If they think they have no voice now, just wait until we all have 2020 vision!!

For the record, I just wanted to add this. While I do want to see feminism burn to the ground for the hateful movement that it is, I’m really not looking forward to the eventual issues we all will have to face. It will be fun for no one, but women will suffer immensely because of this. I’m not looking forward to the most crushing of situations for women, which could be possible during this time. Having to find a suitor to marry simply to increase the odds of survival, yet having to compete for a small amount of stable men against a much larger amount of women. For men it could be brutal, for women; it could be catastrophic. Ladies and gentleman, this is what Patriarchy, while not perfect whatsoever, was trying to protect women and society FROM!! I don’t agree with everything the old ways of the past stood for and some changes would be necessary in the future, but the past could very well have been better than the dark future, which awaits us all.


Posted in Decline, Gender War | Leave a comment

The Ring



Hello fellas, back in the saddle once more after having put out some fires on the home front. I’d once more like to thank those who haven’t removed me from their blogrolls and the visitors who’ve come by to check up on me.  A lot has changed in my absence, we’ve seen the exit of 7 man and CL from the Manosphere (good luck and Godspeed you two), and some chinks in the armor of almighty feminism. Looks like certain feminist activities have really made them look…not so good in the mainstream media. Well Kate, if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em, as your movement is looking less benevolent and more hateful all the time. Must deflect that bad press somehow…too bad people are catching on and you’re possibly loosing popularity.

However, the thing I wish to touch upon now is about the marriage landscape and getting men to say ‘I do’. You see, everyone knows full well that women are the gatekeepers of sex, nothing new to see here. However, just as both women and men have greatly underestimated the irreplaceable male contribution, it seems that many have forgotten a very key point. Men are the gatekeepers of commitment and we can choose to exercise this right however we see fit.

You see, due to the feminization of so many western women, some have deemed the skills, which men sought for in marriage ‘unnecessary’ and even oppressive. What so many have forgotten is that many men have always needed to be enticed into marriage. If a marriage minded man doesn’t find a woman enticing, there’s nothing stopping him from moving on to another one who might. Yes, a wife is entitled to half the assets in a committed relationship, but until a single man either puts a ring on it, or gets a woman pregnant, a single woman isn’t entitled to anything from anybody!!

Think about George Clooney for a sec, the man has been busy dating since his 1993 divorce. He dated Elisabetta Canalis in 2009, but when she pushed for marriage, he bounced. No commitment=no entitlement, and he had nothing stopping him from leaving her as technically he really wasn’t with her. This is as true for Clooney as it is for any man, and more are exercising this choice to the regret of many women.

The difficulty women and greater society is facing is that you can’t shame, force, or cajole men into marriage if they truly don’t wish it. Moreover, if they have no use of marrying a certain type of woman, there is nothing under the sun available to other parties to make them do so. I have some experience with this evident frustration as I mostly dated and then married interracial. The annoyance displayed by a few of the black women we encountered varied from passing irritation, to vocal opposition.  One instance actually had some women calling my girlfriend and I out, yes lads they can get that frustrated. The reality is that unless a man puts a ring on a woman’s finger, or knocks her up; she has no say in regards to his life. Those women that we had upset were simply realizing their lack of power in that regard, and all they could do was complain about it.

The early Patriarchy was designed to entice men, to marry, using chastity and example as leverage to get them to man up. Without this leverage, the truth is that women are left to their own devices as men either choose to opt out, or look for greener pastures. Gentleman, be prepared for situations like what I had encountered to rise as more men take foreign wives while their single countrywoman look on in defenseless disgust.

The main part that many women need to recognize is simply this; if you don’t want to ‘play by the rules’, worry not because someone else will!!


Posted in Gender War | 1 Comment


Once more I have to apologize for the extended delay in my posting. I thank anyone who hasn’t dropped me from their blogrolls and also to the peeps who drop by every so often to read my feckless rhetoric. Yes I thought that I was back many moons ago, but things in my life have gotten very…complex as of late. I’ve been very remiss in blogging, in fact I haven’t even had the chance to get on many manopshere sites much less The Phantom Tollbooth. The one thing I can tell you is that I’m not leaving for good, and I’m itching to get back in the game. However, the truth is that I’m honestly not sure when I will be back. In the meantime I have no other choice but to go on hiatus until I can put out some fires around here.

Stay strong brothers, we are getting the word out there and I will be back for more @$$hole commentary in time.



Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Back In The Saddle



I apologize for the extended absence; things had been a little hairy as of late but seem to be clearing up a little now. Work has been tremendously busy and then our home computer went kaput, we only got it back a few days ago. To top it all off Mrs. Omni and I had to deal with a real hurricane of sorts on the home front, which I may get into some other time. All I can say is that I married a real star and Mrs. Omni proves this to me repeatedly. I’m damn lucky to have her in my life, and I ain’t just saying this. As the saying goes; miss a day, miss a lot holds true and during my ‘siesta’ I missed the departure of Ferdinand Bardamu from the Manosphere.

Sorry I wasn’t there to see your final farewell Ferdinand, thank you for all your work in terms of Men’s Rights and good luck to all your future endeavors. Badger has a great write up on Ferd’s contribution to the Manopshere, and sums things up very well, but I just wanted to expand on one of Badger’s points. It was due to In Mala Fide that I started to read about the plight facing White Nationalists and began to understand their positions. Listen, I’m not trying to say that Ferdinand was a WN, but he allowed them to vent and write articles on In Mala Fide, which gave us valuable insight if we chose to listen.

If not for LIGFY or In Mala Fide, I’d never have run into certain White Nationalist bloggers and heard about how feminism is affecting white men in particular. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, I may not agree with everything they state, but how can I ignore their positions? White Men have beefs, and they have every justification for their righteous anger. However just like men in general are labeled ‘misogynist’ for complaining about their plight, white men are labeled as ‘racists’.

It’s the same song, only the words are different my friends.

I know my post may have some shaking their head in confusion as to why a black man was glad that IMF had allowed WN’s such a pulpit, but the truth is that I’m one of few who can state this, and not be attacked for it. Just like a female MRA can get other women to listen (sometimes) I know damn well I can’t be called a racist (Uncle Tom maybe) for calling sh!t out for what it is!! In all honesty, while all men are getting shafted everyday in general, White Men are targeted in particular. I’m glad that In Mala Fide gave WN’s an additional venue to air their views and finally be heard and I’m sorry to see that particular outlet no longer available to them.

I highly doubt that any WN’s would comment or visit my blog, but the door is open to any if they so choose.

At any rate it’s good to be back, and I’ve working on some posts, which I hope people will appreciate. Happy 4th of July to all my American visitors, and sorry that this post didn’t come out in time for the 1st .


Posted in General | 11 Comments

Young, Wild, And Free


Been a while since my last post, work has been busy, y’all know how it is. I don’t listen to the radio much but I came across this song and it really got me thinking. Could this be a future anthem for young men these days? Maybe this could be adopted by the MGTOW group as I think it’s very adequate stating men’s positions (besides the liberal use of weed that is). So many of the lyrics state what I’m sure many an MRA is thinking these days as the cost/benefit ratio of marriage and ‘growing up’ has been completely blown out of whack for men by and large.

I guess the question, which needs to be asked, is what does this current society have to offer their young men? You know, the men who will be taking the mantle from us elders once our failing hands can no longer support society? What are we willing to offer them in exchange for them to grow up, shed the irresponsibility of their youth and become a pillar of society? Marriage is a minefield nowadays best left for either the bravest or the most stupid of men and in truth, it offer’s them little or nothing in return for their hard work. Men aren’t stupid; they’re not seeing the return on the investment from many of their older cohorts and are second-guessing their future options. When we also consider that marriage is only a consolation with men right from the jump, then we need to realize that responsibility is losing some very serious steam.

How many men are growing up without a positive father figure in the first place? Wasn’t it fathers, and other responsible men who took the mantle of mentor? Wasn’t it these older, and more experienced men who set an example and trained them in the ‘dangers’ of being lackadaisical? I guess this sort of teaching doesn’t happen in a vacuum then huh? Oh we have many people who wish for men to grow up and take their place, but that message is getting stale. Men are realizing that their issues, which directly affect their desire to ‘man up’, will largely be ignored despite the very real perils which, befall them.

This article is yet another example of the glossing over of the issues facing men in marriage 2.0. Personally I loved how many MRA’s weighed in on Cathy Meyer’s article and brutally gave her and other ladies the 411. It’s time that more men stood up and told the truth, many don’t wish to hear it, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t other young bucks reading. The most important aspect of that article there wasn’t the slanted angle Cathy Meyer took, but the behavior of the female commenters there. Men need to see this more often so they can realize just what they’re up against in terms of society’s opinion on men’s issues and their plight.

So with no mentoring and a lack of positive benefits AND definite detriments for investing in a society, what is left for young men other than to be young, wild, and free? Folks, men don’t need women to survive, since investing in society offers men nothing but heartache, we may have to consider something. I don’t think the issue is why should a young man be irresponsible, but why not?

In the end, I think all many can do is continue to watch the downward slide as our younger men, no longer burdened with responsibility, continue to join in the chorus and party like they can live forever. X Box, PlayStation, booze, drugs and loose women sadly offer more than responsibility to a dying system ever will. If we want men to start ‘growing up’ we’ll need to give them a reason to.


Posted in Decline, Gender War | 4 Comments

False Teaching

The very first time I heard the term false teaching was in Church when I was 13. I of course nodded my head during the sermon and agreed that it was bad. I’m no longer a Christian nor do I attend church, but I can still tell you that the sermon hit the nail on the head. In general, the false teaching is simply another word for the propaganda both Western Men and Women are being subject too in contemporary society. Anyone on the Manosphere can name most of the worst ‘lessons’ off the top of their heads;

 Men are always evil vs. women are always good.

 Men and women are interchangeable as they are exactly the same save plumbing.

 Men are oppressors vs. women are oppressed.

The divisive nature of this propaganda is very effective as all one needs to do is watch the decline of society as a gauge. This post isn’t an attempt to sort through all the propaganda, but only to focus on one lie, which negatively affects women in just one way.  Listen, for all the vitriol I spew here on The Phantom Tollbooth, I rail on and on about predominantly one very basic thing. The critical finality of women’s unique characteristics as opposed to men and how quickly it can and does arrive in their lives, changing it drastically.

Folks, as I’ve said in another post, it really does boggle my mind the differences between men and women. It amazes me that men have so much more time on their hands to screw up and then rectify their live paths that sadly women don’t have available to them. This is also why when people start filling women’s heads full of tripe that I have to shake my head. Due to the time limit women have to face and the finality of their situation thereafter, they really don’t have the time for erroneous bullsh!t!!

During this wonderful propaganda film, slideshow about celebrity mothers who had their first children after 40, some women actually commented about the reality of the situation. Rightly so, the mainstream media holds aloft these women as heroines for having children at a time most (read; the medical world, THINK about that for a second) would consider too late and sadly the media eats their success up like candy. Surprise, surprise, they got down voted, for speaking the truth about the situation on top of arguments undermining their position.

The value of the hamster is more powerful that reality, but the sad truth is that even super hamster can’t overpower Mother Nature!! Rationalizations are no match for biology.

This is the message I wish to send females considering motherhood; judge well where you get your information from, due to the fact of the presence of people who would barefaced lie to you in order to salve their own egos. Ladies…this isn’t a joke, the last thing you wish to find out is that you overestimated your chances of fertility when it’s too late!! Sure there’s a chance that you can have a bouncing baby boy in your 40’s, but there’s a greater chance that you will have missed the boat. You really want to gamble with your future happiness in a manner such as this?

To quote a post from a trusted source;

 Do you know how hard it is to want a baby and not be able to make your body produce one?  I’ll tell you – it’s hard.  It’s brutal.  It rips your heart out.  It’ll make you rage.  You will not be able to walk down the street without noticing how many babies and toddlers and little children are running about.

Is that a gamble one wishes to take? Grerp is more reasonable than most, but negative situations can still arise and throw monkey wrenches the size of mack trucks into our plans if one isn’t careful.

I’ll come right out and say it, consider the truth about women’s delicate time limit in a manner of what they wish to accomplish. I’m appalled that people would wish to lie to them in this manner. Listen; I don’t get a toaster for this, okay? I’m not in some sort of Patriarchal Pyramid scheme (PATWAY?) were I have to subvert random females in order to move up the ranks. The truth is that whether women listen to me and have a happy healthy baby or don’t have a child at all literally makes no difference to me whatsoever.

So consider that point while some ruminate over my post. I don’t gain or lose a damn thing whether they listen or not, however, what do they have to lose?


Posted in General | 5 Comments

Pricing Yourself Out of The Market


This post from Fat Girl Jihad has got me thinking that a basic lesson in market value is in order to try and tame the savage beasts on the interwebz.

Here’s the scoop.

Listen, if you wish to sell your house, your trusted real estate agent will undoubtedly take your asking price into consideration before listing. However, if they were worth their salt, they would ALSO have done some homework beforehand. In other words, they will have looked into the most recent sales on your street and/or neighborhood comparing that with similar houses to find a baseline asking price. They do this so you can ask a fair price as dictated by the market, not too low, but also NOT too high!!

Not too high is the point of this post gang.

So let’s say you’re neighborhood has given you a baseline of about $300,000 for your house. Since every house is different, every price point will of course vary however, what happens if one decides their house is worth substantially more than the baseline? What if the homeowner in this case decides to list for nothing under $700,000? Their reasoning of course is because of the additions that have been added (hot tub, pool, extensive basement renovation, you get the idea) and they now feel that anyone would be LUCKY to get THIS house.

Follow what I’m saying?

What do you think will happen? Simply put, the people who would love the house can’t afford the seller’s asking price and they move on to another one. However, what of the people who could afford the asking price, well, they won’t even look at the house twice because they can afford other houses in that price range which offer better amenities for their hard earned cash.

It even seems foolish that this has to be explained to people, but anyone who disagrees with that post needs this lesson in pricing101 apparently.

The reality; the house will sit on the market until one of two things happen. The seller reduces their asinine asking price, or they take their house off the market, simple as. It seems that most may have more common sense involving real estate that people do in the sexual market place, it’s sad but true nonetheless. So many speak about what they ‘deserve’ out of some such situation, but they do so with little to no consideration of the investment and return of actions. There is a reason why the richest, most successful men tend to have the most beautiful wives, AND, that the most attractive women tend to have the most successful and solvent husbands.

Is it a cruel and harsh reality to face for both men and women? You bet, and I’ll be the first to agree to it. Yet, I have to ask anyone reading this post what’s worse in the long run? Being realistic about your market value and working within those boundaries, or following the ‘feel good’ guru’s in the world who state that ‘you should get EVERYTHING you wish’ and sit on the market with a house that no one can either afford or want to buy as valuable time slips away?

The main reason why I state this is because I’ve two female friends who have vastly overestimated their own value in this manner and as a result have scared away some decent buyers to their detriment. Friend number one who is desperate to have children is currently seeing an unemployed (but still arrogant) man who doesn’t wish to have any and has undergone the snippety snip on top of everything else. Friend number two actually had a great guy at one point in time, but as I had figured she would, her moxie didn’t seem to endear her to him.

It isn’t just a good marketing strategy to have a good bead on our market value, as it assists others from eating our lunch. It also makes sure that we don’t turn away reasonable and achievable opportunities for pipe dreams which will NEVER occur. In blunt real estate terms, the woman in the FGJ article is a $300,000 3/2 house asking for over $10 million yet is surprised that all she gets are “losers” and “perverts”.

Due to the ugly truth behind the negotiation, the day will come when the offers this woman even used to get stop coming.


Posted in Gender War | 6 Comments

Tiger by the Tail


I wrote earlier about sniping your nose, and then gave what I felt was an object lesson of a woman who did just that. I guess one could say that if those two posts were about foolish selfishness on a micro level, then this would be the third part on a macro Level.  So we have yet another study which shows that women have now overtaken men as the breadwinners across the globe.

Congratulations should be in order…but don’t go patting yourself on the back quite yet!! You may not know it, but you have a tiger by the tail, don’t worry though that’s what the Manosphere is here for!!

See, there are other statistics that may shed some unwanted light on this newfound success that women so eagerly wish to throw in men’s faces that they may find…sobering.

So, women in school outnumber men by a third and yet they see this as cause for celebration? Not even close, this is a disaster, and many either don’t see, or don’t WISH to see what this means for the future.  Men and women mate for different reasons and no matter how much we want to confuse the facts with social theory or feminism, the reality remains.

It doesn’t matter what Feminism states; there will never be a situation where men en masse have no economic alternative but to marry a woman for economic survival. If you don’t believe me, just ask your sisters Latasha and Kadijah how well they’re doing on the “marry me or else front.” Most black men end up in jail and/or delinquent, most black women end up as single mothers with difficulty supporting themselves, but hey, at least more black women are getting a post secondary education right…right?

In other words, that’s your future; it’s our collective future. Bright isn’t it?

I know what you’re saying; “That won’t happen to me. We’re smarter than that. That won’t happen to (insert this race, generation here).  Time for a reality check; real world consequences don’t give a tinker’s damn about what you or I BELIEVE. They only deliver as per the costs that are available.  I’ll come out and basically say it; women can take men’s place in the economy and infrastructure sector like men can have babies. It only seems like you can at the moment, but if you doubt me, follow the money.

Where does the vast majority of tax revenue originate? The revenue, which pays for the infrastructure, heath care, and social services that women such as you so basically, need? If this post bothers you, go ahead and prove me wrong, look it up…I’ll wait. The only thing you’re going to find is that you may not be as independent as you’d like to believe, and you may wake up and find that you’ve enraged the Genie who made all your wishes come true.

The real reality is this ladies; there is nothing to celebrate whatsoever. Society has lost sight of the fact of what it is that both genders contribute to civilization, and that neither is interchangeable!! These articles only serve to show the ignorance of learned people who should know better considering the large about of resources and education they have available to them.

The article states that if you improve the status of females, you therefore improve the status of everyone.

Gotta wonder if a more erroneous statement has ever been made. Just a question folks, why is the West so ‘successful’ compared to the rest of the world? Would it be because of the fact that life was made better for MEN? Compare Mexico to America or Canada and see how well their men fare and it may brighten your eyes a little, just sayin’. Let’s see how the empowerment of ladies has affected other races shall we? The illegitimacy rate amongst blacks is 70%, amongst Latino’s it’s 50%, whites are still far behind at 30% but here’s the catch.

Guess whose on the hook to ensure that these little children don’t fall through the cracks of society?  You get three, and the first two don’t count, get it? Yet…so many White ladies are celebrating how these SAME statistics are now befalling their own race. You still see something to celebrate? Someone has to pay, if you’re a woman, I can tell you right now it won’t be financial, although you will wish it were!!

Congratulations are in order, right?

Disenfranchised men don’t acquiesce, they drop out. Out of society, out of civilization, out of everything. Women aren’t taking over anything, by the time they do, there will be nothing left to take over, simple as. So that’s the deal ladies, take it anyhow you want to take it, it won’t change a damn thing. Black Ladies couldn’t make it work and are now paying the price, what, pray tell, makes you think you’re ANY different?

Bottom line; women can do men’s jobs, just like men can give birth to  children.


Posted in Decline, Gender War | 4 Comments

Some Are Getting It…Sorta…


While reading this article on The Spearhead, I just encountered this valuable tidbit (H/T boxer) in regards to women possibly thinking outside the box (heh heh).  Turns out a group of women are seeing some threats to their power emerging on the horizon and wish to engage in an intercourse strike between April 28th and May 5th. You know, to make a point in regards to a current ‘war on women’ of course.


The one thing which underlies this dreck…I mean article is that at least some ladies are beginning to comprehend the power and leverage woman have at their disposal.

A woman’s sexuality IS power, it was one of the most effective methods of ‘encouragement’ in a woman’s arsenal…years ago. It was the goal men achieved by paying the price of matrimony years ago and they were happy to pay it.

Now, however not so much.

Chastity is a thing of the past, men of means can and will replace unwilling women, and men who don’t have the means aren’t getting sex regularly anyway. Let me fill y’all in on something, sometimes the men at the top do share some commonality with the men on the bottom. Bluntly, men of means have choices so they won’t put up with sh!t, men without means have no choice, so what does a ‘sexual strike’ do to these men anyway? Both men of means and without have nothing to lose, so in both scenarios, a woman’s power is greatly diminished regardless.

There will be the largest amount of men in the middle of the bell curve, however, I really wonder just how effective it will be, especially in this day and age. Going to keep my ear on the ground with this one, very curious to see how it all plays out!! I have to agree with Boxer’s sentiment; there may be a chance that their ‘strike’ may hit some men below the belt (pun intended), but from the pictorial representation provided…I’m thinking not!!

Just one more point to cover, a quote from the article;

This is (an) issue (which) impacts all of us. This strike is designed to make that point. Ask your man to speak up for your rights, because when we lose our reproductive choices, so do they,”


Men have already lost their reproductive rights and women have proven repeatedly that they WILL NOT speak for them or any other grievances men have. Why pray tell should men give a tinker’s damn about your rights? This is where movements such as the SPLC undermines even your credibility and in truth, highlights how you may not be that much different than they. When men have issues, we’re maligned and ignored, but suddenly women have an issue and it affects ‘all’ of us? That sends a clear and concise message that only women’s issues have merit and men’s don’t. Sorry, this isn’t the type of approach which will engage a man’s goodwill in terms of assistance. This, by the way, is precisely the reason why men are now starting to grumble. Men can see the selfish agenda behind so much of what is claimed to be ‘equality’ which is the source of their growing anger in this day and age. In addition, men’s issues are equally as important and ubiquitous in their scope as far as society and civilization is concerned and NEED to be addressed.

Did they ever stop to think about what the world would look like if men stopped…oh never mind. As my mother used to say; ‘Those who don’t hear, will feel.’


Posted in General | 6 Comments