Been a while gang, sorry for the delay. Just trying to get back into the swing of things at work after a long absence. Now, some may say that I’m jumping onto this bandwagon a little late, but I disagree. The point I wish to illuminate is something that I’ve been stating for a while now in terms of trying to show women the issues behind feminism. As I’ve said before; women won’t listen to any man stating the obvious downfalls of the Feminist movement while stating how it negatively affects men. No gang, if you wish to drive the point home you need to hit ‘em where it hurts. Namely, how it will affect them negatively.
I believe this post comes at a very timely juncture, during the fact that the Toronto Maple Laffs…I mean Leafs have made it to the playoffs for the first time in years!! I had already explained their dismal performance in the past, but everyone needs to revisit why their bleak performance is relevant to anyone on the Manosphere. To quickly recap my post on the topic; the Leafs lose nothing by being perennial losers in the NHL. They are STILLthe most profitable hockey team in the league no matter what they do, win, lose, or draw. The reward/penalty paradigm doesn’t seem to affect them for one reason or another, so there is no driving force for them to seek in order to put wins on the board because the fans will pay large prices regardless.
I could be wrong, but if I where a betting man, I would say that the Leafs WON’T win the Stanley Cup, yet their balance sheet still wont be negatively affected regardless next season. At this point, all the extra money the owners rake in is simply gravy. Bluntly, no negative consequences or penalty to avoid exist, so there’s no reason to add extra effort or change what may not be working.
So, what has this got to do with the Manosphere and Feminism you may ask?
Here we have a few links of some die-hard Feminists and/or entitled Western Women now reconsidering their previous ways. However, the main question we all need to ask is WHY!! Why is it that after all the criticizing that men have done over the years, why after all the times we have tried to show them how mankind is hurting, and why after we have tried to start a dialog that these women have finally stopped and are now reconsidering their past choices?
Simply put…because Feminism, which bestowed these women with so many benefits at the expense of men, has now imparted some negative penalties onto these same women, which they thought themselves insulated from. Mothers who are now grandmothers who had kept the birth fathers from their children now realizing that younger women can use this same power against their younger sons!! Essentially keeping them away from seeing their grandchildren.
Powerful Feminists who have championed the cause of women, now realizing just how much power, which women can abuse for frivolous reasons now that this situation has befallen their own male children. In addition, other influential Feminists hearing the truth from the mouth of babes and possibly realizing that their grrl powa may have gone just a bit too far.
This is the point I wish to drive home to all who read The Phantom Tollbooth. If you want to get a woman to think twice about Feminism, hit ‘em where it hurts’ namely, how it will (and I mean will) eventually affect them negatively. These women are now second-guessing their life’s work, and others are simply aghast that the power that they had abused when they where younger could POSSIBLY be used by another woman against their own male child. TFH always states that women by and large have a poor grasp of cause and effect, this post and the links provided seem to add credence to his statement.
It seems funny and sad in a way that so many Western Women seem to enjoy their current power over men but never even consider that another woman could use that SAME power against their bothers, fathers, uncles, or sons. Had any one of the many false rape apologists, beneficiaries of ‘frivorce’ and affirmative action considered what they where doing to other innocent brothers, fathers uncles or sons of other women?
This is the main push of this post; they didn’t because they never faced any negative consequences for doing so…yet. It never affected their personal household or sphere of influence. Therefore so many Western Women and Feminists will continue to bray on about their so-called ‘Patriarchal Victimization’ until they personally feel the sting of Female entitlement when it hits THEM negatively. The biggest negative that they will have to face; when many men may dismiss their positions and ask them to justify their previous positions.